Sports · Kalshi

4+ wins — Will the Cincinnati pro football team win at least 4 games this season?

97.00%

96.79% fee-adjusted

Executive Briefing

Live Kalshi consensus prices "Yes" at 97% on "4+ wins — Will the Cincinnati pro football team win at least 4 games this season?", backed by $0 in 24h trading volume.

Stats

24h Volume: $0

Compare Across Platforms

Not listed on another platform we track (or no confident match found).

Similar Sports Markets

Polymarket

94.50%-1718

Games Total: O/U 4.5

94.50%Live price only —
no history published

VOL $89.2K

Manifold

34.20%+192

Will any NFL player make a field goal 69 yards or longer in the 2026-2027 season?

34.20%Live price only —
no history published

VOL 42 Mana

Manifold

46.15%+117

MLB: Will the Los Angeles Dodgers sweep the Cincinnati Reds OR will the 3-game series total 26 or more runs?

46.15%Live price only —
no history published

VOL 13 Mana

Manifold

59.45%-147

MLB: Will the Milwaukee Brewers sweep the Cincinnati Reds OR will the 3-game series total 28 or more runs?

59.45%Live price only —
no history published

Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-08-29?

65.50%Live price only —
no history published

VOL $1.8M

Polymarket

0.15%

Will Shakhtar Donetsk win the 2026-27 UEFA Champions League Championship?

0.15%Live price only —
no history published

VOL $426.8K

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current probability for "4+ wins — Will the Cincinnati pro football team win at least 4 games this season?"?

As of the latest update, Kalshi prices this at 97.00%, based on $0 in tracked 24h trading volume.

When does this market close?

This contract is scheduled to resolve on or around January 18, 2027, per Kalshi's listed close time.

Where can I trade this market?

This contract trades live on Kalshi. You can view the live order book and trade it directly at the source link on this page.

Is this market listed on other prediction platforms?

Not currently listed on another platform PredictRankd tracks (Polymarket, Manifold, PredictIt, Limitless, Smarkets, Futuur), or no confidently-verified match was found.