Executive Briefing
Live Polymarket consensus prices "Yes" at 64.5% on "Colts vs. Commanders", backed by $58.8K in 24h trading volume.
Stats
- 24h Volume
- $58.8K
- Momentum
- +0.01pt/day
Your call
The market says 64.5%. Disagree cheaply, or put a record behind it.
Sign in to take a position at the live price and have it scored — Brier, skill, and a personal calibration curve on your portfolio. Play money; no payment details anywhere on this site.
True cost to trade
The quoted price is not what anyone pays. Below it is the same trade with the spread crossed, the depth consumed and the venue's own fee paid — the break-even probability a buyer would actually need to believe.
Live Order Book Depth
Compare Across Platforms
Not listed on another platform we track — but this looks like it might be the same real-world bet (unconfirmed):
Similar Sports Markets
PolymarketSpread: Colts (-3.5)
no history published
ManifoldNFL Week 4: Will the total combined score of the Colts vs. Commanders London game be OVER 46.5 points?
no history published
PolymarketChina Open, Qualification: Elvina Kalieva vs Han Shi
no history published
PolymarketWill Shakhtar Donetsk win the 2026-27 UEFA Champions League Championship?
no history published
PolymarketChina Open, Qualification: Jiaqi Wang vs Zhuoxuan Bai
no history published
PolymarketWill Portland Timbers win the 2026 MLS Cup?
no history published
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current probability for "Colts vs. Commanders"?
As of the latest update, Polymarket prices this at 64.50%, based on $58.8K in tracked 24h trading volume.
When does this market close?
This contract is scheduled to resolve on or around October 4, 2026, per Polymarket's listed close time.
Where can I trade this market?
This contract trades live on Polymarket. You can view the live order book and trade it directly at the source link on this page.
Is this market listed on other prediction platforms?
Not currently listed on another platform PredictRankd tracks (Kalshi, Manifold, PredictIt, Limitless, Smarkets, Futuur), or no confidently-verified match was found.



